4.4 Article

A Semi-implicit Treatment of Porous Media in Steady-State CFD

期刊

TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
卷 112, 期 2, 页码 451-466

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-016-0657-3

关键词

Darcy-Forchheimer; Implicit source term; Coarse grid CFD

资金

  1. Graz University of Technology
  2. COMET-Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies Programme of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit)
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (bmwfw)
  4. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)
  5. Province of Styria
  6. Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG)
  7. Audi-AG
  8. Magna Powertrain Engineering Center Steyr GmbH CoKG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are many situations in computational fluid dynamics which require the definition of source terms in the Navier-Stokes equations. These source terms not only allow to model the physics of interest but also have a strong impact on the reliability, stability, and convergence of the numerics involved. Therefore, sophisticated numerical approaches exist for the description of such source terms. In this paper, we focus on the source terms present in the Navier-Stokes or Euler equations due to porous media-in particular the Darcy-Forchheimer equation. We introduce a method for the numerical treatment of the source term which is independent of the spatial discretization and based on linearization. In this description, the source term is treated in a fully implicit way whereas the other flow variables can be computed in an implicit or explicit manner. This leads to a more robust description in comparison with a fully explicit approach. The method is well suited to be combined with coarse-grid-CFD on Cartesian grids, which makes it especially favorable for accelerated solution of coupled 1D-3D problems. To demonstrate the applicability and robustness of the proposed method, a proof-of-concept example in 1D, as well as more complex examples in 2D and 3D, is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据