4.4 Article

A revisited hemolytic assay for palytoxin detection: Limitations for its quantitation in mussels

期刊

TOXICON
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 225-233

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.06.013

关键词

Palytoxin; Hemolytic assay; Matrix effect; Mytilus galloprovincialis

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health (Progetto Ricerca Corrente, Prevenzione delle patologie da biotossine algali: sviluppo di metodi di screening rapido) [IZSPLV 23/12 RC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palytoxin (PLTX) and its analogues have been detected as seafood contaminants associated with a series of human foodborne poisonings. Due to a number of fatalities ascribed to the ingestion of PLTX-contaminated marine organisms, the development of methods for its detection in seafood has been recommended by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Due to its feasibility, the spectrophotometric hemolytic assay is widely used to detect PLTX in different matrices, even though a standardized protocol is still lacking. Thus, on the basis of available assay procedures, a new standardized protocol was set up using purified human erythrocytes exposed to PLTX (working range: 3.9 x 10(-10)-2.5 x 10(-8) M) in a K-free phosphate buffered saline solution, employing a 5 h incubation at 41 degrees C. An intra-laboratory characterization demonstrated its sensitivity (limit of detection, LOD = 1.4 x 10(-1) M and quantitation, LOQ = 3.4 x 10(-10) M), accuracy (bias = -0.8%), repeatability (RSDr = 15% and 6% for intra- and inter-day repeatability, respectively) and specificity. However, the standardized method seems not to be suitable for PLTX quantitation in complex matrices, such as mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) extracts, at least below the limit suggested by EFSA (30 mu g PLTXs/Kg shellfish meat). Thus, the hemolytic assay for PLTX quantitation in seafood should be used only after a careful evaluation of the specific matrix effects. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据