4.1 Article

Genotoxic and oxidative stress potential of nanosized and bulk zinc oxide particles in Drosophila melanogaster

期刊

TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 1987-2001

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748233715599472

关键词

Comet assay; DNA damage; haemocytes; malondialdehyde; wing-spot test; ZnO

资金

  1. FONDECYT-CONICYT [11110181]
  2. Direccion General de Investigacion y Postgrado, Universidad Catolica de Temuco [DGIP UCT CD 2010-01]
  3. MECESUP UCT [0804]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONP) are manufactured on a large scale and can be found in a variety of consumer products, such as sunscreens, lotions, paints and food additives. Few studies have been carried out on its genotoxic potential and related mechanisms in whole organisms. In the present study, the in vivo genotoxic activity of ZnONP and its bulk form was assayed using the wing-spot test and comet assay in Drosophila melanogaster. Additionally, a lipid peroxidation analysis using the thiobarbituric acid assay was also performed. Results obtained with the wing-spot test showed a lack of genotoxic activity of both ZnO forms. However, when both particle sizes were tested in the comet assay using larvae haemocytes, a significant increase in DNA damage was observed for ZnONP treatments but only at the higher dose applied. In addition, the lipid per oxidation assay showed significant malondialdehyde (MDA) induction for both ZnO forms, but the induction of MDA for ZnONP was higher for the ZnO bulk, suggesting that the observed DNA strand breaks could be induced by mediated oxidative stress. The overall data suggest that the potential genotoxicity of ZnONP in Drosophila can be considered weak according to the lack of mutagenic and recombinogenic effects and the induction of primary DNA damage only at high toxic doses of ZnONP. This study is the first assessing the genotoxic and oxidative stress potential of nano and bulk ZnO particles in Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据