4.2 Article

Promoting physical activity in hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke: a pilot study

期刊

TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 256-261

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1259030

关键词

Mild ischemic stroke; physical activity; self-efficacy; accelerometer; intervention; promotion; rehabilitation

资金

  1. Japanese Physical Therapy Association [A5-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with acute stroke spend most of their hospital day inactive. However, a method to promote physical activity (PA) in stroke has not been established. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of promoting PA by enhancing self-efficacy in hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke. Design: Pre-post interventional study. Methods: Hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke who could walk without assistance were recruited. We measured the daily number of steps taken as the index of daily hospitalized PA using an accelerometer. At the baseline measurement, patients did not receive accelerometer-based feedback. To promote hospitalized PA, a physical therapist provided instruction on the self-monitoring approach and discussed PA targets, encouraged the patients to walk more, and instructed them on the importance of PA after stroke. We also measured self-efficacy for PA using an assessment tool at the baseline and during the intervention. Results: Twenty-two patients (62.5 years old, 68.2% men) were included. PA during the intervention was higher than that at the baseline measurement (5709.4 +/- 2236.1 vs. 2813.9 +/- 1511.9 steps/day, p < 0.001). Self-efficacy for PA during the intervention was also higher than that at the baseline measurement (76.4 +/- 18.8 vs. 58.9 +/- 29.0 points, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Promoting PA by enhancing self-efficacy may increase PA and self-efficacy for PA in hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke. The present results might provide new strategies of PA promotion in these hospitalized patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据