3.9 Article

Profiling Humoral Immune Responses to Clostridium difficile-Specific Antigens by Protein Microarray Analysis

期刊

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1033-1039

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00190-15

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. Nottingham Hospitals Charity
  4. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Department of Research and Development
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2012-12-001] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, and spore-forming bacterium that is the leading worldwide infective cause of hospital-acquired and antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Several studies have reported associations between humoral immunity and the clinical course of C. difficile infection (CDI). Host humoral immune responses are determined using conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Herein, we report the first use of a novel protein microarray assay to determine systemic IgG antibody responses against a panel of highly purified C. difficile-specific antigens, including native toxins A and B (TcdA and TcdB, respectively), recombinant fragments of toxins A and B (TxA4 and TxB4, respectively), ribotype-specific surface layer proteins (SLPs; 001, 002, 027), and control proteins (tetanus toxoid and Candida albicans). Microarrays were probed with sera from a total of 327 individuals with CDI, cystic fibrosis without diarrhea, and healthy controls. For all antigens, precision profiles demonstrated <10% coefficient of variation (CV). Significant correlation was observed between microarray and ELISA in the quantification of antitoxin A and antitoxin B IgG. These results indicate that microarray is a suitable assay for defining humoral immune responses to C. difficile protein antigens and may have potential advantages in throughput, convenience, and cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据