4.4 Article

Physical and chemical mechanisms affecting electrical conductivity in reduced graphene oxide films

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 616, 期 -, 页码 172-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.007

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide; Chromatic confocal imaging; Surface roughness; Film thickness; Electrical conductivity

资金

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand under the Sustainable Composites research grant (MBIE Grant) [3706657]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. MBIE [3706657]
  4. IPF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the influence of surface topography (roughness), surface chemistry (carbon and oxygen functional groups) and physical (film thickness) parameters on the electrical conductivity of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) films. This study was carried out to understand how changes in chemistry, roughness and film thickness, arising from the reduction process, alter the electrical properties of the films. Improved understanding is needed to control and optimise these parameters in graphene/rGO films for future applications where targeted property performance is needed. Films with smooth surfaces, measured using con focal imaging, and lower thicknesses have been shown to possess higher electrical conductivity. X-ray diffraction patterns shows minor changes in d-spacing, though improvements in crystal perfection, orientation and crystallinity could be concluded. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy shows a significant decrease in the oxygen present at the surface as the films are exfoliated to reduce their thickness. Conductivity improves as the materials become increasingly defect-free, achieved by careful control of reduction and post-processing techniques. Ideal practical conductivity is achieved for films of 4 mu m thickness: beyond this point, no practical gains are made (about 25 exfoliation trials from the bulk cast film). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据