4.4 Article

Nanomechanical characterization of porous anodic aluminum oxide films by nanoindentation

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 598, 期 -, 页码 131-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.073

关键词

Glass substrate; Nanostructured porous coating; Anodic aluminum oxide; Nanoindentation; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1462389, 1536209]
  2. South Dakota BOR PIF Grant [SA1200610]
  3. Materials Evaluation and Testing Laboratory (METLab)
  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota State University
  5. State of South Dakota
  6. Bryan Rieger at University High Performance Computing
  7. College of Engineering at South Dakota State University
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1536209, 1462389] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured thin films have gained great interests in recent years due to their significantly enhanced properties and great potential for various applications. Nanoindentation techniques are commonly used to measure nanomechanical properties of thin films and the surface layers of bulk materials. In this article, nanoindentation tests coupled with computer modeling were proposed to characterize nanostructured porous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) films grown on glass. A three-dimensional nanoindentation model was developed. The Young's modulus and hardness were measured by nanoindentation using a Berkowich pyramidal sharp tip indenter. The effects of the substrate and porous structure of the film on the coating measurements were investigated. The dilemma for extracting the mechanical properties of a porous structural film in nanoindentation has been pointed out, and an alternative approach of combinedmodeling/experimental provided a justification by considering the porous structure of the film and minimizing the influence of the substrate. Computer modeling results were validated by experimental data. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据