4.6 Article

Coculture with good-quality COCs enhances the maturation and development rates of poor-quality COCs

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 396-407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.001

关键词

Coculture; IVM; Nuclear maturation; Cytoplasmic maturation; Embryo development

资金

  1. BioGreen 21 Program of the Rural Development Administration [PJ01119601]
  2. Bio-industry Technology Development Program of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea [IPET312060-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pigs, more than half of the recovered cumulus cell-oocyte complexes (COCs) have one or two layers of cumulus cells and are considered morphologically poor. If we could take full advantage of these poor-quality COCs, we could potentially improve the efficiency of in vitro embryo production. During IVM, although some maturation factors are transmitted bidirectionally between the oocyte and the cumulus cells of the same COC, transmission also occurs between different COCs. We hypothesized that morphologically poor COCs fail to undergo complete oocyte maturation because of their insufficient secretion of maturation factors. Here, we investigated whether coculture with morphologically good COCs (having three or more layers of cumulus cells) could improve the maturation and utilization rates of morphologically poor COCs. Our results revealed that the oocyte maturation rate, glutathione level, embryo development capacity, blastocyst quality, and cumulus cell gene expression levels of BCL-2 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were similar in the coculture and good-quality groups and that these levels were all significantly higher than those in the poor-quality group. Our results strongly suggest that the coculture strategy greatly improved the utilization rate of morphologically poor COCs without reducing their capacity for maturation and subsequent development. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据