4.4 Review

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus: A Consensus Report

期刊

THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 143-169

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000260

关键词

everolimus; mTOR inhibitor; therapeutic drug monitoring; transplantation; oncology

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma
  2. Roche Diagnostics
  3. Siemens Healthcare
  4. Thermo Fisher
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Astellas Pharma
  7. Chiesi Pharmaceuticals
  8. Pfizer
  9. Chiesi
  10. Astellas
  11. Novartis
  12. Teva
  13. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  14. Baxter
  15. Sanofi-Aventis GmbH
  16. Biotest AG
  17. HeartWare Inc.
  18. Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation
  19. Chugai Pharma
  20. Chronix Biomedical
  21. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04666] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2014, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology called a meeting of international experts to provide recommendations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice. EVR is a potent inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection and for the treatment of various types of cancer and tuberous sclerosis complex. EVR fulfills the prerequisites for TDM, having a narrow therapeutic range, high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and established drug exposure-response relationships. EVR trough concentrations (C-0) demonstrate a good relationship with overall exposure, providing a simple and reliable index for TDM. Whole-blood samples should be used for measurement of EVR C-0, and sampling times should be standardized to occur within 1 hour before the next dose, which should be taken at the same time everyday and preferably without food. In transplantation settings, EVR should be generally targeted to a C-0 of 3-8 ng/mL when used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs (calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids); in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, the EVR target C-0 range should be 6-10 ng/mL. Further studies are required to determine the clinical utility of TDM in nontransplantation settings. The choice of analytical method and differences between methods should be carefully considered when determining EVR concentrations, and when comparing and interpreting clinical trial outcomes. At present, a fully validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay is the preferred method for determination of EVR C-0, with a lower limit of quantification close to 1 ng/mL. Use of certified commercially available whole-blood calibrators to avoid calibration bias and participation in external proficiency-testing programs to allow continuous cross-validation and proof of analytical quality are highly recommended. Development of alternative assays to facilitate on-site measurement of EVR C-0 is encouraged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据