Access and Quality of Care in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine

Background:Direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine serves millions of patients; however, there is limited research on the care provided. This study compared the quality of care at Teladoc (www.teladoc.com), a large DTC telemedicine company, with that at physician offices and compared access to care for Teladoc users and nonusers.Materials and Methods:Claims from all enrollees 18-64 years of age in the California Public Employees' Retirement System health maintenance organization between April 2012 and October 2013 were analyzed. We compared the performance of Teladoc and physician offices on applicable Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. Using geographic information system analyses, we compared Teladoc users and nonusers with respect to rural location and available primary care physicians.Results:Of enrollees offered Teladoc (n=233,915), 3,043 adults had a total of 4,657 Teladoc visits. For the pharyngitis performance measure (ordering strep test), Teladoc performed worse than physician offices (3% versus 50%, p<0.01). For the back pain measure (not ordering imaging), Teladoc and physician offices had similar performance (88% versus 79%, p=0.20). For the bronchitis measure (not ordering antibiotics), Teladoc performed worse than physician offices (16.7 versus 27.9%, p<0.01). In adjusted models, Teladoc users were not more likely to be located within a healthcare professional shortage area (odds ratio=1.12, p=0.10) or rural location (odds ratio=1.0, p=0.10).Conclusions:Teladoc providers were less likely to order diagnostic testing and had poorer performance on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for bronchitis. Teladoc users were not preferentially located in underserved communities. Short-term needs include ongoing monitoring of quality and additional marketing and education to increase telemedicine use among underserved patients.