4.5 Article

Laboratory measurements of Vp and Vs in a porosity-developed crustal rock: Experimental investigation into the effects of porosity at deep crustal pressures

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 677, 期 -, 页码 218-226

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.044

关键词

Elastic wave velocity measurement; Porosity; Izu-Bonin-Mariana (IBM) arc

资金

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [19GS0211, 19340160, 19540502, 26109001]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19340160, 26109001, 25400516, 19540502, 16K17821] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the influence of porosity on the elastic properties of crustal rocks at deep crustal pressures, we performed laboratory measurements of compressional-wave (Vp) and shear-wave (Vs) velocities in a porosity-developed gabbro sample up to 1.0 GPa at room temperature. Based on the measured Vp and Vs data, we evaluated the changes in velocities, Vp/Vs, Poisson's ratio (sigma), and total porosity of the rock as a function of pressure. Compared with the 'porosity-free' intrinsic elastic values of the gabbro sample, our results suggest that the development of porosity in crustal rocks lowers their Vp, Vs, Vp/Vs, and Poisson's ratio. Deviations (Delta Vp, Delta Vs, Delta Vp/Vs, and Delta sigma) of the measured values from the intrinsic values are enhanced with increasing porosity. We evaluated the AVp from previous experimental study on the rocks of Tanzawa plutonic complex providing constraints on interpretation of the seismic velocity profiles of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana (IBM) arc and found a large negative Delta Vp (up to - 22.7%) at lower pressures. The intrinsic velocity combined with the measured velocity data at in situ pressure conditions suggest that the ranges of Vp (6.0-6.5 km/s) in the middle crust of the IBM arc reflect the presence of considerable porosity and its closure in intermediate rocks and/or the change of composition from felsic to intermediate in mid-crustal rocks. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据