4.7 Article

Comparison of the solid-phase extraction efficiency of a bounded and an included cyclodextrin-silica microporous composite for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons determination in water samples

期刊

TALANTA
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 95-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.05.011

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Solid phase extraction; Cyclodextrin-silica bounding; Water; Preconcentration

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2009-14564-C04-04, MAT2012-38429-C04-03]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2009/108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-phase extraction is one of the most important techniques for sample purification and concentration. A wide variety of solid phases have been used for sample preparation over time. In this work, the efficiency of a new kind of solid-phase extraction adsorbent, which is a microporous material made from modified cyclodextrin bounded to a silica network, is evaluated through an analytical method which combines solid-phase extraction with high-performance liquid chromatography to determine polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples. Several parameters that affected the analytes recovery, such as the amount of solid phase, the nature and volume of the eluent or the sample volume and concentration influence have been evaluated. The experimental results indicate that the material possesses adsorption ability to the tested polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Under the optimum conditions, the quantification limits of the method were in the range of 0.09-2.4 mu g L-1 and fine linear correlations between peak height and concentration were found around 1.3-70 mu g L-1. The method has good repeatability and reproducibility, with coefficients of variation under 8%. Due to the concentration results, this material may represent an alternative for trace analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water trough solid phase extraction. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据