4.7 Article

Evaluation of flow injection-solution cathode glow discharge-atomic emission spectrometry for the determination of major elements in brines

期刊

TALANTA
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 314-320

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.060

关键词

Liquid discharge; Brines; Organic substance; Interference

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41173018, 21375120, 41521001]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University from the Ministry of Education [NCET-13-1015]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFA20720]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method for the determination of major metal elements in high salinity brines was developed by solution cathode glow discharge (SCGD) with flow injection analysis (FIA). The matrix interferences of major cations and anions in brines have been evaluated. It was found that high concentration of Na+ and K+ could interfere each other, K+ at a concentration of 400 mg L-1 enhanced the signal intensity of Na+ more than 20%. The effect of the anions was observed and it was noted that the signal intensity of both Ca2+ and Mg2+ were suppressed significantly when the SO42- reached 100 mg L-1. It was demonstrated that some low molecular weight organic substances such as formic acid, glycerol and ascorbic acid could eliminate interference of SO42- even with volume percentages of 0.5%. Under the optimized condition, the proposed FIA-SCGD can determine K, Na, Ca and Mg with the limits of detection of 0.49 (K), 0.14 (Na), 11 (Ca) and 5.5 (Mg) ng mL(-1). The proposed method has been successfully applied to the analysis of 5 salt lake samples and compared with those obtained with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). The advantages of small size, low energy consumption, good stability and repeatability indicated that the SCGD is promising for the determination of major ions in brine samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据