4.7 Article

Improved quantification of farnesene during microbial production from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in two-liquid-phase fermentations

期刊

TALANTA
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 100-106

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.08.031

关键词

Isoprenoids; Biofuels; GC-MS; GC-FID; Metabolic engineering

资金

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, FORMAS
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  4. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10CC1016517] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NNF Center for Biosustainability [Yeast Cell Factories] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic solvents are widely used in microbial fermentations to reduce gas stripping effects and capture hydrophobic or toxic compounds. Reliable quantification of biochemical products in these overlays is highly challenging and practically difficult. Here, we present a significant improvement of identification and quantification methods for farnesene produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in two-liquid-phase fermentations using GC-MS and GC-FID. By increasing the polarity of the stationary phase introducing a ZB-50 column (50%-phenyl-50%-dimethylsiloxane) peak intensity could be increased and solvent carryover could be minimized. Direct quantification of farnesene in dodecane was achieved by GC-FID whereas GC-MS demonstrated to be an excellent technique for identification of known and unknown metabolites. The GC-FID is a suitable technique for direct quantification of farnesene in complex matrices as shown by the good calibration curve (R-2 > 0.998, N=5) within the tested concentration range of 150 mu g/mL and the reproducibility of the intensity (intraday; < 10% RSD at each concentration; N=5). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method were 0.24 and 0.80 mu g/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the FID method proved to be highly stable with regard to the intensity of the calibration (N=6) when the measurements were performed across 250 samples that were derived from a dodecane overlay. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据