4.7 Article

Ultra-high performance liquid chromatographic determination of antioxidants in teas using inkjet-printed graphene-polyaniline electrode

期刊

TALANTA
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 673-679

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.05.020

关键词

UHPLC; Electrochemical detection; Inkjet-printing; Graphene; Polyaniline; Polyphenolic; Antioxidants

资金

  1. Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology
  2. Thailand Research Fund through Research Team Promotion Grant [RTA5780005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A development of ultra-high performance liquid chromatographic coupled with a novel inkjet-printed conductive ink-modified electrode for a fast and simultaneous determination of polyphenolic antioxidants was achieved. Two printing techniques were selected for fabrication and modification including (i) an in-house screen-printing method and (ii) an inkjet-printing method, respectively. A conductive ink containing graphene and polyaniline nanocomposite (G-PANI) was precisely casted onto the surface of screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) using a dimatix inkjet material printer. Compared to a bare SPCE, the G-PANI-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (G-PANI/SPCE) exhibited higher electrochemical sensitivity with increase (2-4 times) of peak current of each antioxidant. Moreover, four antioxidants were successfully separated and determined within 3 min using a reverse phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with a mobile phase containing phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (90:10 v/v). Under an optimal detection potential at +1.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl, linear calibrations and limits of detection (S/N=3) for antioxidants were found to be 0.01-10 mu g mL(-1) and 1.38-1.94 ng mL(-1), respectively. Finally, this proposed method has been successfully used for the determination of antioxidants in tea samples, the results obtained from our presented method were within a highly good agreement those obtained from a standard UHPLC-UV method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据