4.3 Article

A Study of Human Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor and Multidrug Resistance Gene Polymorphisms in Children With Immune Thrombocytopenia

期刊

CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 429-440

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1076029615576738

关键词

multidrug resistance gene 1; human killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors gene; childhood; immune thrombocytopenia; genetic association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective: This study was undertaken to detect characterization of the different gene polymorphisms in Human killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR2) gene and multi-drug resistance (MDR1) gene, among childhood ITP Egyptian patients. In addition to assess the potential role of these polymorphisms in relation to types of ITP and response to different treatment modalities. Patients and Methods: A total of 48 pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; 24 newly diagnosed and 24 chronic) and 35 healthy controls were investigated via polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for multidrug resistance (MDR) 1 and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) 2 genes. Results: The frequency of MDR1 gene in patients and control was not significant (P = .090). The CT genotype was the highest distribution among all ITP cases (62.50%, n = 30) and control (48.60%, n = 17). There was a significant difference in age at diagnosis of MDR1 gene with the CC genotype had the eldest age and lowest initial platelets count (P = .029 and P = .004). The distribution of KIR2 gene among all patients with ITP and controls was significant (P = .026) with (KIRDL2-/KIRDS2-) genotype was the most prevalent among patients. Conclusion: The frequency of MDR1 polymorphisms was not associated with susceptibility to the development and clinical progression of the disease. However, KIR2 gene polymorphisms were independently associated with childhood ITP in Egyptian patients with highest prevalence among (KIRDL2-/KIRDS2-) genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据