4.5 Article

Target reliability for existing structures considering economic and societal aspects

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 181-194

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1198394

关键词

Economic optimisation; existing structures; human safety; Life Quality Index; target reliability

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [P105/12/G059]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LG14012, LD15037]
  3. Regensburg Center of Energy and Resources (RCER) of the Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg (OTH Regensburg)
  4. Technology and Science Network Oberpfalz (TWO)
  5. European Commission [CZ/13/LLP-LdV/TOI/134014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specification of target reliability levels is one of the key issues of the assessment of existing structures. ISO 13822:2010 and ISO 2394:2015 indicate procedures for specification of target reliability levels by optimisation of the total cost related to an assumed remaining working life of a structure. These approaches are critically compared with human safety criteria, with target levels based on a marginal life-saving costs principle, and with recommendations of present standards. Optimal target reliability levels are then derived in the representative case study for an existing structural member. It appears that the requirement to reach the same target reliability levels for existing and new structures is uneconomical. Decisions made in the assessment can result in the acceptance of the actual state or in the upgrade of an existing structure. Two reliability levels are thus needed - the minimum level below which the structure is unreliable and should be upgraded, and the target level indicating an optimum upgrade strategy. It is recommended that these levels be established using economic optimisation and the marginal life-saving costs principle, as both the approaches take into account the costs of safety measures and the failure consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据