4.5 Article

Vision-based quantitative assessment of microcracks on reactor internal components of nuclear power plants

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1013-1026

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1231207

关键词

Non-destructive evaluation; vision-based assessment; nuclear power plant; microcrack quantification

资金

  1. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
  2. Qatar National Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ageing power facilities are increasingly susceptible to the onset of damage related to long exposure to stress, radiation, elevated temperatures and environmental conditions. One failure mechanism of particular concern is the onset of stress corrosion cracking. Currently, a technician manually measures the crack thicknesses at few points along a microcrack in a microscopic image, and the results are quantified by the Root Mean Square (RMS) of these measurements. This approach is time-consuming and subjective. In addition, the crack thickness is an important but difficult characteristic to accurately describe in a single numerical value, since it can vary considerably along the length of a crack. In this paper, a vision-based methodology is proposed for accurate quantification of microcracks that provides the thickness measurements for each pixel along the crack centreline. The proposed approach provides the minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, RMS and the histogram of crack thicknesses, which in most cases yields thousands of measurements. This approach provides more comprehensive insight regarding the condition of a microcrack. A region-growing method is used for segmenting microcracks from complex backgrounds. The microcrack thicknesses are then automatically computed along the lines orthogonal to the crack centreline. The fast marching method is used to accurately estimate the centreline of microcracks. Several real microcracks are examined to evaluate the performance of the proposed methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据