4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of groundwater interaction in North American regional climate simulations with WRF/Noah-MP

期刊

CLIMATIC CHANGE
卷 129, 期 3-4, 页码 485-498

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1308-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation [NA13NES4400003]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (MAPP-CTB) [NA14OAR4310186]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [0939961] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fluxes of water and energy between the land surface and atmosphere involve many complex non-linear processes. In this study, the Noah and Noah-MP land surface models with multiple groundwater sub-models are used to assess how the treatment of canopy processes and interactions with deep groundwater affect 6 month regional climate simulations in two contrasting years, 2002 and 2010. Unlike the free drainage models, the models with groundwater capability have upward flux from the aquifer at different periods in the simulation. The inter-model Noah-MP soil moisture and latent heat flux results are consistent with recharge differences: the stronger upward flux capability with interactive groundwater results in the highest soil moisture and latent heat flux of the Noah-MP models. The increased latent heat effect on increased precipitation is small, which may result from negligible differences in convective precipitation. The Noah-MP model, independent of groundwater option, improves upon a cold and dry bias in the spring Noah simulations both during the day and night. The results for summer are region dependent and also differ between year and time of day. For a majority of the simulation period, there is little groundwater effect on the Noah-MP near-surface diagnostic fields. However, when the Noah-MP model produces large warm/dry biases in the 2010 summer, the aquifer interactions in Noah-MP improve the air temperature bias by 1-2 A degrees C and dew point temperature bias by 1 A degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据