4.7 Article

PPM1A Methylation Is Associated With Vascular Recurrence in Aspirin-Treated Patients

期刊

STROKE
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 1926-1929

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013340

关键词

aspirin; methylation; phenotype; platelet aggregation; stroke

资金

  1. Miguel Servet grant (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [CP12/03298]
  2. Miguel Servet grant (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional)
  3. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Abdul Mohsen Al Tuwaijri Chair for Applied Research in Stroke, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia
  4. SEDMAN Project
  5. Jagiellonian University Medical College [K/ZDS/003844]
  6. Redes Tematicas de Investigacion Cooperativa en Salud [RD12-0014-0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Despite great efforts by pharmacogenetic studies, the causes of aspirin failure to prevent the recurrence of ischemic events remain unclear. Our aim was to study whether epigenetics could be associated with the risk of vascular recurrence in aspirin-treated stroke patients. Methods-We performed an epigenetic joint analysis study in 327 patients treated with aspirin. In the discovery stage, we performed a nested case-control study in 38 matched ischemic stroke patients in whom 450000 methylation sites were analyzed. Nineteen patients presented vascular recurrence after stroke, and 19 matched patients did not present vascular recurrence during the first year of follow-up. In a second stage, 289 new patients were analyzed by EpiTYPER. Results-The following 3 differentially methylated candidate CpG sites, were identified in the discovery stage and analyzed in the second stage: cg26039762 (P=9.69x10(-06), RAF1), cg04985020 (P=3.47x10(-03), PPM1A), and cg08419850 (P=3.47x10(-03), KCNQ1). Joint analysis identified an epigenome-wide association for cg04985020 (PPM1A; P=1.78x10(-07)), with vascular recurrence in patients treated with aspirin. Conclusions-The pattern of differential methylation in PPM1A is associated with vascular recurrence in aspirin-treated stroke patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据