4.7 Article

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Vascular Hyperintensities-Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Mismatch Identifies Acute Stroke Patients Most Likely to Benefit From Recanalization

期刊

STROKE
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 424-427

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010999

关键词

infarction; magnetic resonance angiography; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion imaging; thrombolysis

资金

  1. Societe Francaise de Radiologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH) beyond the boundaries of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (FVH-DWI mismatch) have been proposed as an alternative to perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)-DWI mismatch. We aimed to establish whether FVH-DWI mismatch can identify patients most likely to benefit from recanalization. Methods-FVH-DWI mismatch was assessed in 164 patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion before intravenous thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch (PWI T-max>6sec/DWI>1.8) was assessed in the 104 patients with available PWI data. We tested the associations between 24-hours complete recanalization on magnetic resonance angiography and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score <= 2), stratified on FVH-DWI (or PWI-DWI) status. Results-FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 121/164 (74%) patients and recanalization in 50/164 (30%) patients. The odds ratio for favorable outcome with recanalization was 16.2 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-46.5; P<0.0001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.1; P=0.22) in those without FVH-DWI mismatch (P=0.048 for interaction). Recanalization was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.3; P=0.0001) and in patients without PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.1; P=0.047), P=0.76 for interaction. Conclusion-The FVH-DWI mismatch may rapidly identify patients with proximal occlusion most likely to benefit from recanalization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据