4.7 Article

Long-Term Clinical Impact of Vascular Brain Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Older Adults in the Population

期刊

STROKE
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 2865-2869

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014695

关键词

cerebral small vessel disease; dementia; epidemiology; magnetic resonance imaging; stroke

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. Caisse Nationale Maladie des Travailleurs Salaries
  3. Direction Generale de la Sante
  4. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (MGEN)
  5. Institut de la Longevite
  6. Conseils Regionaux of Aquitaine and Bourgogne
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Ministry of Research-INSERM Programme Cohortes et collections de donnees biologiques
  9. French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche)
  10. Fondation Leducq
  11. Initiative of Excellence (IdEX) of Bordeaux University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-White matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and covert brain infarcts are highly prevalent in older adults and are often asymptomatic. We compared the impact of WMH volume and brain infarcts on risk of clinical stroke and dementia in older adults in the population. Methods-Participants were 1677 individuals aged 65 years from the 3-City Dijon study, who were free of stroke and dementia at baseline, followed-up for 12 years. Results-Both lesion types were comparably associated with an increased risk of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.40 for WMH volume and hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.93 for brain infarcts), but only WMH volume was associated with an increased risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.83). Conclusions-The differential impact of WMH and brain infarcts on clinical stroke and dementia suggests relatively different prognostic value of the 2 lesions. WMHs may represent a particularly pertinent magnetic resonance imaging intermediate marker that can be utilized in optimizing prevention strategies for both stroke and dementia in primary care and in trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据