4.2 Article

Metabolic switches during the first steps of adipogenic stem cells differentiation

期刊

STEM CELL RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 413-421

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2016.09.001

关键词

Adult stem cells; Adipogenesis; Metabolism; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Antioxidant activity; Cytoprotection

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq [447149/2014-8]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES/SETI/Fundacao Arauciria [1041/2013]
  3. Fundacao Araucaria [1273/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The understanding of metabolism during cell proliferation and commitment provides a greater insight into the basic biology of cells, allowing future applications. Here we evaluated the energy and oxidative changes during the early adipogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (hASCs). hASCs were maintained under differentiation conditions during 3 and 7 days. Oxygen consumption, mitochondrial mass and membrane potential, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities, non-protein thiols (NPT) concentration and lipid peroxidation were analyzed. We observed that 7 days of adipogenic induction are required to stimulate cells to consume more oxygen and increase mitochondrial activity, indicating organelle maturation and a transition from glycolytic to oxidative energy metabolism. ROS production was only increased after 3 days and may be involved in the differentiation commitment. ROS source was not only the mitochondria and we suggest that NOX proteins are related to ROS generation and therefore adipogenic commitment. ROS production did not change after 7 days, but an increased activity of catalase and NPT concentration as well as a decreased lipid peroxidation were observed. Thus, a short period of differentiation induction is able to change the energetic and oxidative metabolic profile of hASCs and stimulate cytoprotection processes. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据