4.3 Article

Effect of various plasticizers and concentration on the physical, thermal, mechanical, and structural properties of cassava-starch-based films

期刊

STARCH-STARKE
卷 69, 期 1-2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/star.201500366

关键词

Cassava film; Mechanical properties; Physical properties; Plasticizers; Thermal properties

资金

  1. University Putra Malaysia
  2. Exploratory Research Grant Scheme [9389900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated the effects of plasticizers (fructose, urea, tri-ethylene glycol, and triethanolamine) with different concentrations on the physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of cassava-starch-based films. The film samples were prepared using casting methods. The moisture content, water solubility, and water absorption of the films increased with increasing plasticizer content. Fructose-plasticized films show excellent water resistance compared to other plasticizers. Film plasticized with 30% fructose showed the highest density (1.74g/cm(3)), but the lowest water content (10.96%) and water absorption (110%). Films containing fructose presented smooth surfaces without pores. The glass transition temperatures of the plasticized film also decreased with increased plasticizer content, irrespective of the plasticizer type. The relative crystallinity decreased with increasing plasticizer content. The film plasticized by 30% fructose presented higher relative crystallinity (0.31). The increase of plasticizer concentration resulted in a decrease of tensile strength, but increased elongation at break of the film samples. Film plasticized with 30% fructose showed the highest tensile strength (4.7MPa) and tensile modulus (69MPa). Thus, fructose was the most efficient plasticizer agent among the various plasticizers used in this study. High contents of plasticizer resulted in changes in the properties of the films. Overall, it can be concluded that the plasticizer type and concentration significantly influence the properties of cassava-starch-based film.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据