4.3 Article

MsFLASH participants' priorities for alleviating menopausal symptoms

期刊

CLIMACTERIC
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 859-866

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1083003

关键词

MENOPAUSE; SYMPTOMS; VASOMOTOR SYMPTOMS; SLEEP DISTURBANCES; FATIGUE; COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
  4. Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
  5. NIA [U01 AG032656, U01AG032659, U01AG032669, U01AG032682, U01AG032699, U01AG032700]
  6. Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute from the NIH, National Center for Research Resources, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award [UL1RR02571]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To describe self-reported menopausal symptom priorities and their association with demographics and other symptoms among participants in an intervention trial for vasomotor symptoms (VMS).Methods Cross-sectional study embedded in the MsFLASH 02 trial, a three-by-two factorial design of yoga vs. exercise vs. usual activity and omega-3-fatty acid vs. placebo. At baseline, women (n=354) completed hot flush diaries, a card sort task to prioritize symptoms they would most like to alleviate, and standardized questionnaires.Results The most common symptom priorities were: VMS (n=322), sleep (n=191), concentration (n=140), and fatigue (n=116). In multivariate models, women who chose VMS as their top priority symptom (n=210) reported significantly greater VMS severity (p=0.004) and never smoking (p=0.012), and women who chose sleep as their top priority symptom (n=100) were more educated (p0.001) and had worse sleep quality (p<0.001). ROC curves identified sleep scale scores that were highly predictive of ranking sleep as a top priority symptom.Conclusions Among women entering an intervention trial for VMS and with relatively low prevalence of depression and anxiety, VMS was the priority symptom for treatment. A card sort may be a valid tool for quickly assessing symptom priorities in clinical practice and research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据