4.7 Article

NIR emission studies and dielectric properties of Er3+-doped multicomponent tellurite glasses

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.02.039

关键词

Tellurite glass; Erbium; NIR emission; Dielectric properties

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [03(1241)/12/EMR II]
  2. UGC
  3. DST through SAP-DRS [F.530/12/DRS/2009 (SAP-1)]
  4. DST-PURSE [SR/S9/Z-23/2010/22 (C,G)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multicomponent tellurite glasses containing altered concentrations of Er2O3 (ranging from 0 to 1 mol%) were prepared by the standard melt quenching technique. Investigations through energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Raman scattering spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, near-infrared (NIR) emission studies and dielectric measurement techniques were done to probe their compositional, structural, spectroscopic and dielectric characteristics. The broad emission together with the high values of the effective linewidth (similar to 63 nm), stimulated emission cross-section (9.67 x 10(-21) cm(2)) and lifetime (2.56 ms) of I-4(13/2) level for 0.5 mol% of Er3+ makes these glasses attractive for broadband amplifiers. From the measured capacitance and dissipation factor, the relative permittivity, dielectric loss and the conductivity were computed; which furnish the dielectric nature of the multicomponent tellurite glasses that depend on the applied frequency. Assuming the ideal Debye behavior as substantiated by Cole-Cole plot, an examination of the real and imaginary parts of impedance was performed. The power-law and Cole-Cole parameters were resolved for all the glass samples. From the assessment of the emission analysis and dielectric properties of the glass samples, it was obvious that the Er3+ ion concentration had played a vital role in tuning the optical and dielectric properties and the 0.5 mol% of Er3+-doped glass was confirmed as the optimum composition. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据