4.5 Article

Exogenous application of hydrogen peroxide alleviates drought stress in cucumber seedlings

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 23-28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.05.008

关键词

Antioxidants; Cucumber; Drought; Hydrogen peroxide; Osmotic adjustment

资金

  1. Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province, China [2011BMZ090]
  2. project for Discipline Groups Construction of Food New-Type Industrialization of Hubei University of Arts and Science [2015SP180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought limits plant growth and crop yield worldwide and more frequent occurrences of water shortages are expected according to climate change projections. However, relatively little is known about whether the spraying of plants leaves with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) would alleviate the symptoms of drought stress. In this study, 3-week -old cucumber seedlings exposed to different soil water contents (non-limiting soil water conditions, medium drought, and severe drought) were foliar-sprayed with 1.5 mM H2O2. Growth, photosynthesis and oxidative defense system were determined after one week of treatment. Results showed that exogenous H2O2 significantly increased biomass, leaf relative water content (RWC) and chlorophyll content, coupled with increased net photosynthetic rate (P-n), especially under medium drought. Meanwhile, superoxide anion radicals (O-2(-)), electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels decreased whereas the activities of key antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) as well as soluble sugar and proline contents increased in H2O2-treated plants. Hence, exogenously applied H2O2 considerably improved drought tolerance of cucumber plants by increasing the plant antioxidative defense system and the capacity for osmotic adjustment to alleviate membrane lipid peroxidation and to reestablish cell turgor, and thereby increasing photosynthesis, particularly under medium drought. (C) 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据