4.6 Article

Parabolic trough collector or linear Fresnel collector? A comparison of optical features including thermal quality based on commercial solutions

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 198-215

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.039

关键词

Concentrating solar power; Linear collectors; Monte Carlo Ray Trace; Optical losses; Flux intensity

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competividad [ENE2012-37950-C02-01, ENE2012-3795 0-C02-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parabolic trough collectors (PTCs) are still today the most mature technology in concentrating solar power. However, linear Fresnel collectors (LFCs) have been identified by many authors as a candidate to reduce the levelized cost of electricity, although with lower efficiencies. Within Fresnel technology, two possibilities appear for the receiver: multitube receiver and secondary reflector receiver. In the present work a developed Monte Carlo Ray Trace code is used in order to compare the energy effectiveness and flux intensity map at the receiver for different days of the year and different orientations in Almeria, Spain, and in Aswan, Egypt. The optical annual energy and exergy efficiencies are also obtained for PTCs and LFCs, with multitube or secondary reflector receiver, where the concentration at each tube is used to weigh the exergy efficiency. It results that the maximum efficiency is obtained by PTCs, while the lowest one corresponds to LFCs with multitube receiver. Also, it is concluded that, while for PTCs NS orientation leads to clearly higher efficiencies, this is not the case for LFCs, where both orientations achieve similar efficiencies even when the solar field has been designed for NS orientation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据