4.6 Article

Solvent effects on the morphology and stability of PTB7:PCBM based solar cells

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 490-499

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.018

关键词

Inverted solar cell; Blend morphology; Non-chlorinated solvent; Xylene; OPV stability

资金

  1. Short Term Scientific Mission program [STSM-MP1307-010115-053731]
  2. Adelis Foundation
  3. ENEA (Ente Nazionale Energia e Ambiente)
  4. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to fabricate highly efficient organic photovoltaic devices should be combined with an adequate device lifetime, as well as with reduced environmental impact of the manufacture process. Herein PTB7:PCBM-based inverted solar cells were fabricated using different solvents, and their morphology and stability were characterized. The solvents used were the halogenated chlorobenzene (CB) and the non-halogenated ortho-xylene (XY), which is expected to be less environmentally hazardous. While the PV performance was comparable for both cell types, morphology characterization showed a solvent dependent vertical stratification with PTB7-enriched top surface in CB-films and PCBM-rich surface in XY-films. The cell performances were investigated following different stressing conditions to determine their relative stability and degradation mechanisms. Stressing of encapsulated cells demonstrated the effect of photolysis on the cell stability and showed enhanced degradation of XY-cells compared to CB cells, possibly related to residual XY in the active film. Stressing of non-encapsulated cells showed the effect of ambient on the cell stability, and corroborated the enhanced XY-cell sensitivity to UV illumination. We suggest that thorough removal of solvent traces, as well as UV filtering, would improve XY-cells' stability, and allow its use in large-scale cell manufacture while eliminating halogenated solvents from the process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据