4.4 Article

Numerical analyses of steady-state seepage problems using the interpolation finite difference method

期刊

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 608-626

出版社

JAPANESE GEOTECHNICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.003

关键词

Seepage analysis; Interpolation FDM; Arbitrary domain; Flow net; Free surface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seepage analyses have mainly been executed using the finite element method; numerical analyses using the finite difference method (FDM) have been limited to cases where the calculation domains are comparatively simple. This limitation is observed because FDM is considered to be inappropriate for application in calculations over complex domains However, by applying the so-called interpolation FDM (IFDM), we can now freely solve two- and three-dimensional elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) over complex domains with high speed and high accuracy. By adopting this procedure, named the boundary polynomial interpolation, all of the numerical analyses of elliptic PDEs reduce to Dirichlet problems over regular domains This method is also effective in the calculation of a flow net where mixed Dirichlet and Neumann conditions exist. By giving the coordinate values of changing points regarding the polygonal line of a domain and boundary conditions, grid generation is automatically carried out and numerical solutions are promptly obtained. In this paper, the method of saturated seepage analyses with a fixed domain is first formulated and then expanded to unconfined domain problems, namely, free surface problems. While analytical solutions of the PDE are highly limited, there is an analytical solution for the location of the free surface in a rectangular dam. The numerical solutions obtained using the IFDM are compared with the analytical ones, and it is shown that the proposed method has adequate accuracy in practice and wide applicability as a general method of numerically solving seepage problems. (C) 2016 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据