4.4 Article

Pore network structure linked by X-ray CT to particle characteristics and transport parameters

期刊

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 676-690

出版社

JAPANESE GEOTECHNICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.008

关键词

Micro-focus X-ray CT; Pore structure; Mass transport parameters

资金

  1. JSPS, Core Research Evolutionary Science and Technology (CREST) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [2460375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mass transport in soils occurs through pore networks that are highly affected by basic physical properties such as the degree of compaction, and particle size and shape. In this study, micro-focus X-ray computed tomography (CT) was used to obtain information on the pore network structure at different compaction levels for repacked columns of sands and glass beads representing different size fractions and particle shapes. Mass transport parameters, including gas diffusion coefficient (D-p) and air permeability (k(a)) at variably saturated conditions, were measured on the same columns using standard methods, and literature data on saturated hydraulic conductivity (K-sat) for the same materials were analyzed. A comparison of X-ray CT derived pore network structure and physical parameters showed that the round sands and glass beads exhibited larger pores, a higher pore coordination number, and a lower volumetric surface area than that of angular sands at the same particle size, resulting in higher K-sat as well as higher D-p and k(a) under relatively dry conditions. The X-ray CT derived the mean pore diameter (d), and the pore coordination number (C-n) for each material correlated well with key gas transport properties such as percolation thresholds and pore network connectivity. A predictive D-p model from wet to dry conditions based fully on X-ray CT derived parameters (d and C-n) was developed and showed good agreement with measured D-p for both round and angular sands. (C) 2016 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据