4.4 Article

Soil Characteristics and Wind Erosion Potential of Wheat-Oilseed-Fallow Cropping Systems

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 704-710

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2015.12.0427

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oilseeds are integral to the production of biofuels and diversifying rainfed cropping systems in the US Pacific Northwest (PNW). However, there is evidence to suggest greater potential for wind erosion when growing oilseeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotations. Little is known concerning the impact of growing oilseeds on the soil surface characteristics that affect erosion. Soil characteristics were examined during the fallow phase of three crop rotations: (i) winter wheat-summer fallow (WW-SF), (ii) winter wheat-camelina (Camelina sativa L. Grantz)-summer fallow (WW-C-SF), and (iii) winter wheat-safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)-summer fallow (WW-S-SF) at Lind and Ritzville, WA. Crop residue biomass and soil water content, roughness, surface strength, and aggregate size distribution were measured immediately after sowing winter wheat. Camelina and safflower did not affect soil water content, random roughness, penetration resistance, geometric mean diameter, or the erodible fraction, possibly due to the short duration over which the rotations were monitored in this study. Flat residue biomass and cover, however, tended to be greater in the WW-SF rotation. The Revised Wind Erosion Equation suggested that sediment transport could be from 57 to 212% greater for the WW-C-SF or WW-S-SF than the WW-SF rotation due to differences in crop residue characteristics after sowing wheat. These results indicate that crop residue must be carefully managed to minimize the occurrence and intensity of wind erosion from dryland oil-seed cropping systems in the PNW. Specifically, no-till management may be required to manage crop residues during the fallow phase of a wheat-oil-seed-fallow rotation to control wind erosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据