4.7 Article

Denitrification as a source of nitric oxide emissions from incubated soil cores from a UK grassland soil

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.009

关键词

Nitrous oxide; Flow-through system; Isotopes; Grassland; Nitrogen cycle; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J004286/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/K001051/1]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-08412-AGR]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K001566/1, BB/K001051/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/K001566/1, BB/K001051/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural soils are a major source of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O), which are produced and consumed by biotic and abiotic soil processes. The dominant sources of NO and N2O are microbial nitrification and denitrification. While N2O emissions have been attributed to both processes, depending on the environmental conditions such as substrate availability, pH and water filled pore space (WFPS), NO emissions are thought to predominantly derive from nitrification. Although attributing gaseous emissions to specific processes is still difficult, recent findings challenge the latter of those assumptions. Using the gas-flow-soil-core method, i.e soil cores incubated under a He/O-2 atmosphere at constant surface gas flow, combined with N-15 labelled isotopic techniques, the present study investigated the role of denitrification on NO, N2O and N-2 emissions in a UK grassland soil under high soil moisture and an aerobic headspace atmosphere. With the application of KNO3 and glucose to support denitrification, denitrification was the source of N loss of between 0.61 and 0.67% of the added N via NO emissions, 1.60-1.68% via N2O and 0.03-0.05% via N-2 emissions. Overall, our study showed that denitrification has been overlooked as a source of NO emissions. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据