4.7 Article

The worm has turned: Behavioural drivers of reproductive isolation between cryptic lineages

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 11-17

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.015

关键词

Cryptic speciation; Reproductive isolation; Allopatric speciation; Sympatric speciation; Pre-copulatory; Chemical cues

资金

  1. Marie Curie Fellowship [FP7-IEF-GA-2012-329690]
  2. Spanish Government [FPDI-2013-16407]
  3. [F/00407/AI]
  4. NERC [NE/F001185/1, NE/F001274/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F001185/1, NE/F001274/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioural processes such as species recognition and mate attraction signals enforce and reinforce the reproductive isolation required for speciation. The earthworm Lumbricus rubellus in the UK is deeply differentiated into two major genetic lineages, 'A' and 'B'. These are often sympatric at certain sites, but it is not known whether they are to some extent reproductively isolated. Behavioural tests were performed, in which individually genotyped worms were able to choose between soils previously worked either by genetically similar or dissimilar individuals (N = 45). We found that individuals (75%) were significantly (P < 0.05) more likely to orientate towards the soil conditioned by worms of their own lineage. Further testing involved a choice design based on filter papers wetted with water extracts of soils worked by a different genotype on each side (N = 18) or extracts from worked soil vs. un-worked control soil (N = 10). Again, earthworms orientated towards the extract from their kindred genotype (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that genotype-specific water-soluble chemicals are released by L. rubellus; furthermore, they are behaviour-modifying, and play a role in reproductive isolation between sympatric earthworm lineages of cryptic sibling species, through pre-copulatory assortative mate choice. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据