4.7 Article

Mycorrhizal hyphal disruption induces changes in plant growth, glomalin-related soil protein and soil aggregation of trifoliate orange in a core system

期刊

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 82-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.02.010

关键词

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Extraradical mycelium; Water-stable aggregate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By breaking up soil, tillage often disrupts mycorrhizal extraradical mycelium (ERM). In a core having four windows covered with 37-mu m mesh in a perspex box, trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings were colonized with an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, Funneliformis mosseae. The core was rotated weekly at 180 degrees around vertical axes, in order to simulate ERM disruption. After 13 such rotations, root mycorrhizal colonization, soil hyphal length inside and outside the core, and plant biomass were substantially reduced. On the other hand, mycorrhizal inoculation without disruption of ERM (static core) was associated with significant increase in biomass production, compared with disruption of ERM (rotating core). Disruption of ERM (rotating core) inhibited the production of easily-extractable glomalin-related soil protein (EE-GRSP) and total GRSP (T-GRSP) inside the core under mycorrhization, due to breakdown of ERM. Mycorrhization markedly increased soil organic carbon content, distribution of water-stable aggregate (WSA) at 0.5-4 mm size and mean weight diameter (MWD), whereas core rotation showed a negative effect on MWD and the percentage of WSA within 1-4 mm size under mycorrhization and within 0.25-2 mm size under non-mycorrhization. It was proposed that soil tillage, in terms of the core rotation, strongly disrupted ERM network, which adversely influenced EE-GRSP and T-GRSP production and plant growth under mycorrhization, subsequently weakening the GRSP functioning on WSA stability. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据