4.4 Article

Black holes as particle detectors: evolution of superradiant instabilities

期刊

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
卷 32, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/134001

关键词

black holes; superradiance; gravitational waves; accretion; axions; scalar field

资金

  1. FCT-IDPASC program [SFRH/BD/52047/2012]
  2. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian through the Programa Gulbenkian de Estimulo a Investigacao Cientifica
  3. European Union's FP7 ERC Starting Grant 'The dynamics of black holes: testing the limits of Einstein's theory' [DyBHo-256667]
  4. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  5. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  6. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  7. European Community through the Intra-European Marie Curie [AstroGRAphy-2013-623439]
  8. FCT-Portugal [IF/00293/2013, CERN/FP/123593/2011]
  9. NRHEP FP7-PEOPLE-IRSES Grant [295189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superradiant instabilities of spinning black holes (BHs) can be used to impose strong constraints on ultralight bosons, thus turning BHs into effective particle detectors. However, very little is known about the development of the instability and whether its nonlinear time evolution accords to the linear intuition. For the first time, we attack this problem by studying the impact of gravitational-wave (GW) emission and gas accretion on the evolution of the instability. Our quasi-adiabatic, fully-relativistic analysis shows that: (i) GW emission does not have a significant effect on the evolution of the BH, (ii) accretion plays an important role, and (iii) although the mass of the scalar cloud developed through superradiance can be a sizeable fraction of the BH mass, its energy-density is very low and backreaction is negligible. Thus, massive BHs are well described by the Kerr geometry even if they develop bosonic clouds through superradiance. Using Monte Carlo methods and very conservative assumptions, we provide strong support to the validity of the linearized analysis and to the bounds of previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据