4.6 Article

Nanometric thermal fluctuations of weakly confined biomembranes measured with microsecond time-resolution

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 12, 期 21, 页码 4755-4768

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6sm00412a

关键词

-

资金

  1. DAAD
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. European Research Council [2013-337283, 307104 FP/2007-2013/ERC/SYNINTER]
  4. Cluster of Excellence: Engineering of Advanced Materials''
  5. Research Training Group 1962 of the Friedrich-Alexander Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg
  6. European Research Council via AMIDEX grant Affinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We probe the bending fluctuations of bio-membranes using highly deflated giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) bound to a substrate by a weak potential arising from generic interactions. The substrate is either homogeneous, with GUVs bound only by the weak potential, or is chemically functionalized with a micro-pattern of very strong specific binders. In both cases, the weakly adhered membrane is seen to be confined at a well-defined distance above the surface while it continues to fluctuate strongly. We quantify the fluctuations of the weakly confined membrane at the substrate proximal surface as well as of the free membrane at the distal surface of the same GUV. This strategy enables us to probe in detail the damping of fluctuations in the presence of the substrate, and to independently measure the membrane tension and the strength of the generic interaction potential. Measurements were done using two complementary techniques - dynamic optical displacement spectroscopy (DODS, resolution: 20 nm, 10 ms), and dual wavelength reflection interference contrast microscopy (DW-RICM, resolution: 4 nm, 50 ms). After accounting for the spatio-temporal resolution of the techniques, an excellent agreement between the two measurements was obtained. For both weakly confined systems we explore in detail the link between fluctuations on the one hand and membrane tension and the interaction potential on the other hand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据