4.6 Article

Facilely assess the soluble behaviour of the β-nucleating agent by gradient temperature field for the construction of heterogeneous crystalline-frameworks in iPP

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 594-601

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sm02030a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [51421061, 51373108, 21574088]
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2013TD0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleating agent (NA) species with solubility and self-assembly abilities can readily and effectively manipulate the crystalline morphology of semicrystalline polymers through the construction of heterogeneous frameworks prior to the primary crystallization of basal resins. However, the solubility of NA species is difficult to assess by the current traditional methods. In this study, gradient temperature field (g-T field) was utilized for the first time to ascertain the dissolution and self-assembly behaviors of beta-NA in the melts of isotactic polypropylene (iPP). The g-T field technique can facilely assess the soluble behavior of beta-NA by determining the transformation between several NA frameworks, namely the needle-, flower- and dendrite-like supramolecular structures. Clarifying the soluble behavior of beta-NA is of great significance to guide the formation of various crystalline frameworks under the homo-temperature fields and control the resultant crystalline morphology of beta-modified iPP. Some interesting findings are summarized as follows: (1) an in situ observation under the g-T field clearly indicates the sequential occurrence of various nucleation and crystallization events in the same observed window, and proves the migration of well molten beta-NA, (2) the exact correlation between T-f and framework type reveals that an abrupt transformation (over the narrow temperature range of 1 degrees C) occurred between needle-like and dendrite-like frameworks, (3) the primary crystallization of iPP is strongly dependent on the construction mode of the beta-NA framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据