4.8 Article

Bimetallic Metal-Organic Frameworks: Probing the Lewis Acid Site for CO2 Conversion

期刊

SMALL
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 2334-2343

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201503741

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) Programme-Singapore Peking University Research Centre for a Sustainable Low-Carbon Future
  3. NTU-A*Star Silicon Technologies Centre of Excellence [11235100003]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322205, 21371014, 11175006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly porous metal-organic framework (MOF) incorporating two kinds of second building units (SBUs), i.e., dimeric paddlewheel (Zn-2 (COO)(4)) and tetrameric (Zn-4(O) (CO2)(6)), is successfully assembled by the reaction of a tricarboxylate ligand with Zn-II ion. Subsequently, single-crystal-to-single-crystal metal cation exchange using the constructed MOF is investigated, and the results show that Cu-II and Co-II ions can selectively be introduced into the MOF without compromising the crystallinity of the pristine framework. This metal cation-exchangeable MOF provides a useful platform for studying the metal effect on both gas adsorption and catalytic activity of the resulted MOFs. While the gas adsorption experiments reveal that Cu-II and Co-II exchanged samples exhibit comparable CO2 adsorption capability to the pristine Zn-II-based MOF under the same conditions, catalytic investigations for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 with epoxides into related carbonates demonstrate that Zn-II-based MOF affords the highest catalytic activity as compared with Cu-II and Co-II exchanged ones. Molecular dynamic simulations are carried out to further confirm the catalytic performance of these constructed MOFs on chemical fixation of CO2 to carbonates. This research sheds light on how metal exchange can influence intrinsic properties of MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据