4.6 Review

The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 52-73

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.009

关键词

The Pittsburgh sleep quality index; Psychometric properties; Sensibility; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Scholarship
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Saunderson Family Chair in Acquired Brain Injury Research
  5. Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant-Institute for Gender and Health [CGW-126580]
  6. Ontario Work Study Program
  7. Youthdale Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review appraises the process of development and the measurement properties of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), gauging its potential as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in non-clinical and clinical samples; it also compares non-clinical and clinical populations in terms of PSQI scores. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and HAPI databases were searched. Critical appraisal of studies of measurement properties was performed using COSMIN. Of 37 reviewed studies, 22 examined construct validity, 19 - known-group validity, 15 - internal consistency, and three test-retest reliability. Study quality ranged from poor to excellent, with the majority designated fair. Internal consistency, based on Cronbach's alpha, was good. Discrepancies were observed in factor analytic studies. In non-clinical and clinical samples with known differences in sleep quality, the PSQI global scores and all subscale scores, with the exception of sleep disturbance, differed significantly. The best evidence synthesis for the PSQI showed strong reliability and validity, and moderate structural validity in a variety of samples, suggesting the tool fulfills its intended utility. A taxonometric analysis can contribute to better understanding of sleep dysfunction as either a dichotomous or continuous construct. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据