4.7 Article

Effect of electrode properties and operational parameters on capacitive deionization using low-cost commercial carbons

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 39-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.043

关键词

CDI; Activated carbon; Desalination; Electrode thickness; Carbon black; Electrosorption

资金

  1. FAPESP - Brazil (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)
  2. CAPES - Brazil (Coordenacao de Aperfeimamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  3. CNPq - Brazil (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  4. CNPq
  5. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unequal distribution of the water resources warrants a search for more energy efficient water treatment technologies. In this regard, capacitive deionization (CDI) could play a leading role particularly in the case of brackish water desalination. In this work, inexpensive materials that are commercially available were investigated for being used as electrodes in CDI. After physical and electrochemical evaluation, activated carbon (AC) demonstrated superior performance compared to the different fabrics tested. Hereafter, a factorial design of experiments was used to investigate the effect of cell potential, mass of AC (m(AC)), carbon black, and interparticle porosity on ion removal, charge efficiency and energy consumption. The results showed that neither carbon black nor macroporosity had a single effect on electrode performance. An interaction effect of macroporosity and m(AC) was found to be beneficial in terms of ion electrosorption for thick electrodes. An additional evaluation concerning the role of electrode thickness revealed that an increase in thickness translated into an increase in the total salt removed and a reduction in ion removal per mass of electrode. In addition, while electrosorption kinetics were found to be independent of the AC thickness, slow desorption kinetics were detected for the thicker electrodes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据