4.7 Article

Magnetic lanthanide oxide catalysts: An application and comparison in the heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of diethyl phthalate in aqueous solution

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 57-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.12.031

关键词

Catalytic ozonation; Lanthanide oxide; Magnetic catalyst; DEP

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20907042, 21277126]
  2. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project, Ministry of Education of China [708052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic oxidation with nano magnetic catalysts has the advantages of easy recovery, good stability and high activity. In this study, three nano magnetic lanthanide catalysts with a core-shell structure of Ce/SiO2@Fe3O4, La/SiO2@Fe3O4 and Pr/SiO2@Fe3O4 were prepared and characterized by Brunauer-Emmet-Teller, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive X-ray spectrum and vibrating sample magnetometer analysis. All catalysts have Fe3O4 nanoparticles as cores, SiO2 as the mid-layer, and CeO2, La2O3, or Pr6O11 as the outer layer, and have a good magnetic property. The catalyst activities followed the descending order of Pr/SiO2@Fe3O4 > La/SiO2@Fe3O4 > Ce/SiO2@Fe3O4 upon the degradation of diethyl phthalate (DEP), and the catalytic ozonation process followed an (OH)-O-center dot reaction mechanism. The removal rate of DEP was small effected because of the presence of Cl-, and addition of sodium carbonate had no obviously influence. The initial mineralization rate had a positive relation with the hydroxyl groups and pH value at the zero charge point (pH(pzc),) of the catalysts, but had no significant relation with the surface area of the catalysts. The catalysts were relatively effective and stable after 3 repeated uses, and the leaching out concentrations of Ce, La and Pr were 1.33 mg/L, 0.138 mg/L and 0.115 mg/L after a 90 min reaction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据