4.7 Article

Box-Behnken response surface design for the optimization of electrochemical detection of cadmium by Square Wave Anodic Stripping Voltammetry on bismuth film/glassy carbon electrode

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 67-73

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.051

关键词

Response surface methodology; Square Wave Anodic Stripping; Voltammetry; Interaction effect; Bismuth film electrode; Cd(II)

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA102302]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120008110033]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016 XD001]
  4. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2015CM016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a Box-Behnken design (BBD) was conducted and the response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to investigate the influence to different parameters to Cd(II) detection at bismuth film/glassy carbon electrode (Bi/GCE) by Square Wave Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (SWASV), and the stripping peak current was used to evaluate the detection performance of each parameter combination. A three-level-three-factor full factorial (33) BBD has been conducted to investigate interaction effects. The relationship between stripping peak current and the three factors was quantitatively described by a multivariate regression model through the RSM. The optimal parameter combination within the studied experimental range was obtained to improve the detection performance, considering the interaction effects among Bi(III) concentration, pH and deposition potential. Under the optimal parameter combination, SWASV was applied to detect the concentration of Cd(II) on Bi/GCE, the linear calibration curve ranged from 1 to 170 with a detection limit of 0.3 mu g/L (S/N = 3). The proposed analytical procedure was further applied to detect trace Cd(II) in soil samples with satisfactory results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据