4.7 Article

Forster resonance energy transfer analysis of quantum dots and peptide self-assembly inside a capillary

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 619-625

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.086

关键词

Quantum dots; CE-FL; In-capillary; Self-assembly

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2014AA020521]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201085, 81473269]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141170]
  4. Science & Technology Support Program of Changzhou [CE20145022, CJ20159028]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed a new method using fluorescence coupled capillary electrophoresis (CE-FL) for monitoring self-assembly of quantum dots (QDs) and ATTO 590 labeled peptide (ATTO-EA(5)H(6)) inside a capillary. QDs and ATTO-EA(5)H(6) were sequentially injected into the capillary, thereafter they mixed and self-assembled inside the capillary. Such in-capillary self-assembly was driven by a metal-affinity force which yielded a new fluorescence signal due to Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). CE-FL was used to measure and record the self-assembly status and rate with electrophoretograms under various conditions. Recorded electrophoretograms have shown that in-capillary assay gave out different patterns of the assembly compared to out-capillary assay. The efficiency of the QDs and ATTO-EA(5)H(6) self-assembly on in-capillary assay was affected by the molar ratio and the time interval of injection. More importantly, the in-capillary assay could be applied to detect the stability of QD-ATTO-EA(5)H(6) assembly. The results indicated that high concentration of imidazole (Im) could displace a portion of ATTO-EA(5)H(6) on QDs surface. This assay could further expand the application of FRET in the field of QDs-based online bioanalysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据