4.7 Article

An asymmetrical inertial piezoelectric rotary actuator with the bias unit

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 179-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.10.004

关键词

Piezoelectric actuator; Bias unit; Asymmetrical clamping structures; Inertia

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51205369, 51507154]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY15E050010]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial University students planted talent plan Project [2015R404028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel piezoelectric inertial rotary actuator with a bias unit that is based on asymmetrical clamping structures was presented in this paper. Under the same circumstance, the designed actuator with symmetrical electrical signals produced a relatively larger inertial driving moment difference because of the existence of the bias unit. Mechanical analysis was derived and the simulation model of the bias unit was built to ascertain the influence of structural parameters on output performance. A prototype with a bias unit, a carrying device and a friction adjusting device was fabricated and an experimental system was built to evaluate the performance in terms of output displacement, angular velocity, driving moment and bearing capacity. Both simulation and experimental results indicated that the bias unit improved angular velocity and output force to some extent. Compared with the actuator without a bias unit, the actuator with the offset distance of 15 mm enhanced the maximum angular velocity by approximately 54.88% from 3.48 rad/s to 5.39 rad/s under 100V, 23 Hz and the highest driving moment by 50.2% from 2.41 N mm to 3.62 N mm. Angular displacement resolution reached 14.3 mu rad under 15 V, 1 Hz and heavy bearing capacity attained 1300g under 100V, 4Hz. In general, the proposed actuator can achieve larger angular velocity and higher carrying capacity than those in literature. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据