4.6 Article

Dicotyledon Weed Quantification Algorithm for Selective Herbicide Application in Maize Crops

期刊

SENSORS
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/s16111848

关键词

weed crop discrimination; grid sprayer; herbicide reduction; site specific; sprayer boom; monocot and dicot coverage ratio vision (MoDiCoVi)

资金

  1. MoDiCoVi Proof of Concept project
  2. Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education
  3. University of Southern Denmark
  4. Aarhus University
  5. Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation project: The Intelligent Sprayer Boom
  6. RoboWeedSupport project - Danish GUDP program at The Danish AgriFish Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stricter legislation within the European Union for the regulation of herbicides that are prone to leaching causes a greater economic burden on the agricultural industry through taxation. Owing to the increased economic burden, research in reducing herbicide usage has been prompted. High-resolution images from digital cameras support the studying of plant characteristics. These images can also be utilized to analyze shape and texture characteristics for weed identification. Instead of detecting weed patches, weed density can be estimated at a sub-patch level, through which even the identification of a single plant is possible. The aim of this study is to adapt the monocot and dicot coverage ratio vision (MoDiCoVi) algorithm to estimate dicotyledon leaf cover, perform grid spraying in real time, and present initial results in terms of potential herbicide savings in maize. The authors designed and executed an automated, large-scale field trial supported by the Armadillo autonomous tool carrier robot. The field trial consisted of 299 maize plots. Half of the plots (parcels) were planned with additional seeded weeds; the other half were planned with naturally occurring weeds. The in-situ evaluation showed that, compared to conventional broadcast spraying, the proposed method can reduce herbicide usage by 65% without measurable loss in biological effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据