4.4 Review

Topical Review: Development of overgrown semi-polar GaN for high efficiency green/yellow emission

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/31/9/093003

关键词

semipolar GaN; overgrowth; InGaN; LED

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M015181/1, EP/L017024/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L017024/1, EP/H004602/1, EP/M015181/1, EP/M003132/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M015181/1, EP/H004602/1, EP/M003132/1, EP/L017024/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most successful example of large lattice-mismatched epitaxial growth of semiconductors is the growth of III-nitrides on sapphire, leading to the award of the Nobel Prize in 2014 and great success in developing InGaN-based blue emitters. However, the majority of achievements in the field of III-nitride optoelectronics are mainly limited to polar GaN grown on c-plane ( 0001) sapphire. This polar orientation poses a number of fundamental issues, such as reduced quantum efficiency, efficiency droop, green and yellow gap in wavelength coverage, etc. To date, it is still a great challenge to develop longer wavelength devices such as green and yellow emitters. One clear way forward would be to grow III-nitride device structures along a semi-/non-polar direction, in particular, a semi-polar orientation, which potentially leads to both enhanced indium incorporation into GaN and reduced quantum confined Stark effects. This review presents recent progress on developing semi-polar GaN overgrowth technologies on sapphire or Si substrates, the two kinds of major substrates which are cost-effective and thus industry-compatible, and also demonstrates the latest achievements on electrically injected InGaN emitters with long emission wavelengths up to and including amber on overgrown semi-polar GaN. Finally, this review presents a summary and outlook on further developments for semi-polar GaN based optoelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据