4.5 Article

Characteristics of Induced/Triggered Earthquakes during the Startup Phase of the Guy-Greenbrier Earthquake Sequence in North-Central Arkansas

期刊

SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 620-630

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0220150252

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program [G12AP20101]
  2. Arkansas Geological Survey
  3. Center for Earthquake Research and Information (CERI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Between August 2010 and June 2011, an intense sequence of induced earthquakes occurred along the Guy-Greenbrier fault in central Arkansas due to fluid injection at nearby waste disposal wells. A previous study by Horton (2012), limited to similar to 1000 earthquakes having M-D > similar to 2.0, illuminated the similar to 13 km fault. We present an updated catalog of 17,395 earthquakes that is complete between 0 <= M-L <= 4.4 between August 2010 and 20 October 2010, with earthquakes located using an updated 1D velocity model for the region. The inclusion of the small-magnitude events reveals that seismicity starts below the SRE injection well a month earlier than estimated using only M-D > 2 events. During this period of time, the seismicity migrated from north to south, enhancing the resolution of three joined sections that form the northern similar to 7.3 km portion of the fault, which plunges southward. The seismogenic zone covers the lower portion of the Paleozoic sedimentary layers and extends into the crystalline Precambrian basement (similar to 3 km < z < 7.5 km). Earthquake size distribution varies along the fault, with most M-L > 3 events constrained within the basement. A b-value of 1.01 was obtained for the updated catalog during this period, with the b-value varying between 1.37 and 0.72 for different clusters of events. The seismicity pattern at depth is coincident with structural geologic features observed within the Fayetteville Shale (at similar to 1500 m depth).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据