4.7 Article

Tree water status influences fruit splitting in Citrus

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 96-104

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.009

关键词

Citrus; Climate; Physiological disorder; Splitting; Trunk growth rate; Soil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fruit splitting or cracking is a major physiological disorder in fruit trees markedly influenced by environmental conditions, but conclusive data still are required to provide a definite explanation and preventive measures. Changes in climatic conditions critically influence fruit splitting incidence. We studied plant-soil-ambient water relations in splitting-prone citrus grown under 4 contrasting environmental conditions (climate type and soil), in Spain and Uruguay, over a six years period. Automatic trunk and fruit diameter measurements (trunk and fruit growth rate and maximum daily trunk shrinkage), which are a tree water status indicator, together with factors modifying the tree and fruit water relationship (temperature, ET, rainfall, soil texture, soil moisture, rootstock and xylem anatomy) were studied and correlated with splitting. A close fruit splitting and soil texture relationship was found, inversely correlated with clay and silt percentages, and positively with those for sand. Under 85%-sand soil conditions, slight changes in soil moisture due to fluctuations in temperature, ET, or rainfall changed trunk and fruit growth rate patterns during few hours and induced splitting. Splitting incidence was higher in trees with larger xylem vessels in the fruit peduncle due to rootstock ('Carrizo' and 'C-35' citrange being higher than 'FA-5', 'Cleopatra' and Poncirus trifoliata). Finally, reducing the frequency of irrigation by half increased midday canopy temperatures (similar to 5 degrees C) and splitting (+15%). We conclude that irregularities in the tree water status, due to interactions among soil moisture, rootstock and climatic conditions, leads to a number of substantial changes in fruit growth rate increasing the incidence of fruit splitting. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据