4.8 Article

P-selectin is a nanotherapeutic delivery target in the tumor microenvironment

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 345, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7374

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Director's New Innovator Award [DP2-HD075698]
  2. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30-CA008748]
  3. Experimental Therapeutics Center
  4. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research
  5. Alan and Sandra Gerry Metastasis Research Initiative
  6. Imaging and Radiation Sciences Program
  7. Cycle for Survival
  8. Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Young Investigator's Fund
  9. Honorable Tina Brozman Foundation for Ovarian Cancer Research
  10. Anna Fuller Fund
  11. Frank A. Howard Scholars Program
  12. Center for Molecular Imaging and Nanotechnology at MSKCC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disseminated tumors are poorly accessible to nanoscale drug delivery systems because of the vascular barrier, which attenuates extravasation at the tumor site. We investigated P-selectin, a molecule expressed on activated vasculature that facilitates metastasis by arresting tumor cells at the endothelium, for its potential to target metastases by arresting nanomedicines at the tumor endothelium. We found that P-selectin is expressed on cancer cells in many human tumors. To develop a targeted drug delivery platform, we used a fucosylated polysaccharide with nanomolar affinity to P-selectin. The nanoparticles targeted the tumor microenvironment to localize chemotherapeutics and a targeted MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibitor at tumor sites in both primary and metastatic models, resulting in superior antitumor efficacy. In tumors devoid of P-selectin, we found that ionizing radiation guided the nanoparticles to the disease site by inducing P-selectin expression. Radiation concomitantly produced an abscopal-like phenomenon wherein P-selectin appeared in unirradiated tumor vasculature, suggesting a potential strategy to target disparate drug classes to almost any tumor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据